Diplomacy incongruity, as with any incongruity, is typically revealing of ulterior motives. That the West is risking a bigger conflagration is testimony to its rejection to desert long-held notions of Western supremacism.
An additional week, an additional barrage of disconcerting information. Two days ago, on 13 June, Israel attacked Iran. Certainly, this is being mounted by Western elites and media as a “pre-emptive strike” on Iran’s nuclear centers to prevent the mullahs from getting nuclear outbreak capability. The reality is far more threatening: Israel attacked Iran because it had a window of possibility while the Islamic Republic is weaker than it has actually maybe ever before been since 1979, and Israel has actually been coming under sluggish, increasing pressure from Western nations to allow altruistic help into the Gaza Strip. On the 2nd, it has actually been successful: Western countries seem to have forgotten Israel’s plan of “liberal genocide” in the Gaza Strip, to the extent they ever before even resembled recognizing it, and show up poised to proactively participate in Israel’s protection in spite of the reality that Israel started this latest round of conflict and despite that it is laden with risks both regionally and internationally. Why? How to explain the absurdity?